[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f9f60754-ef84-483f-bd77-b7bc99aadb27@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 15:55:00 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Qingfang Deng <dqfext@...il.com>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>,
Nathan Sullivan <nathan.sullivan@...com>,
Josh Cartwright <josh.cartwright@...com>,
Zach Brown <zach.brown@...com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@...il.com>,
Qingfang Deng <qingfang.deng@...lower.com.cn>,
Hao Guan <hao.guan@...lower.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: phy: leds: fix memory leak
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 11:25:56AM +0800, Qingfang Deng wrote:
> From: Qingfang Deng <qingfang.deng@...lower.com.cn>
>
> A network restart test on a router led to an out-of-memory condition,
> which was traced to a memory leak in the PHY LED trigger code.
>
> The root cause is misuse of the devm API. The registration function
> (phy_led_triggers_register) is called from phy_attach_direct, not
> phy_probe, and the unregister function (phy_led_triggers_unregister)
> is called from phy_detach, not phy_remove. This means the register and
> unregister functions can be called multiple times for the same PHY
> device, but devm-allocated memory is not freed until the driver is
> unbound.
>
> This also prevents kmemleak from detecting the leak, as the devm API
> internally stores the allocated pointer.
>
> Fix this by replacing devm_kzalloc/devm_kcalloc with standard
> kzalloc/kcalloc, and add the corresponding kfree calls in the unregister
> path.
>
> Fixes: 3928ee6485a3 ("net: phy: leds: Add support for "link" trigger")
> Fixes: 2e0bc452f472 ("net: phy: leds: add support for led triggers on phy link state change")
> Signed-off-by: Hao Guan <hao.guan@...lower.com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Qingfang Deng <qingfang.deng@...lower.com.cn>
Thanks for the fix. I agree with Maxime, this looks correct.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
The use of devm_free() should trigger any reviewer to take a closer
look because it generally means something is wrong.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists