[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <2C55C2BA-667E-4253-8A8C-FB21AC8D6775@linux.dev>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 10:51:42 +0800
From: Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>
To: nifan.cxl@...il.com
Cc: willy@...radead.org,
mcgrof@...nel.org,
a.manzanares@...sung.com,
dave@...olabs.net,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
david@...hat.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Fan Ni <fan.ni@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/hugetlb: Refactor unmap_hugepage_range() to take
folio instead of page
> On Apr 17, 2025, at 23:43, nifan.cxl@...il.com wrote:
>
> From: Fan Ni <fan.ni@...sung.com>
>
> The function unmap_hugepage_range() has two kinds of users:
> 1) unmap_ref_private(), which passes in the head page of a folio. Since
> unmap_ref_private() already takes folio and there are no other uses
> of the folio struct in the function, it is natural for
> unmap_hugepage_range() to take folio also.
> 2) All other uses, which pass in NULL pointer.
>
> In both cases, we can pass in folio. Refactor unmap_hugepage_range() to
> take folio.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fan Ni <fan.ni@...sung.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists