[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0f260941-0bbe-4dad-b622-a1a8ecc0a8e5@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 13:50:59 -0700
From: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
To: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<dave.hansen@...el.com>, <seanjc@...gle.com>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>
CC: <peterz@...radead.org>, <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
<weijiang.yang@...el.com>, <john.allen@....com>, <bp@...en8.de>,
<xin3.li@...el.com>, Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar
<mingo@...hat.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "H. Peter
Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>, "Mitchell
Levy" <levymitchell0@...il.com>, Vignesh Balasubramanian <vigbalas@....com>,
Aruna Ramakrishna <aruna.ramakrishna@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] x86/fpu/xstate: Always preserve non-user
xfeatures/flags in __state_perm
On 4/10/2025 12:24 AM, Chao Gao wrote:
> From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
>
> When granting userspace or a KVM guest access to an xfeature, preserve the
> entity's existing supervisor and software-defined permissions as tracked
> by __state_perm, i.e. use __state_perm to track *all* permissions even
> though all supported supervisor xfeatures are granted to all FPUs and
> FPU_GUEST_PERM_LOCKED disallows changing permissions.
>
> Effectively clobbering supervisor permissions results in inconsistent
> behavior, as xstate_get_group_perm() will report supervisor features for
> process that do NOT request access to dynamic user xfeatures, whereas any
> and all supervisor features will be absent from the set of permissions for
> any process that is granted access to one or more dynamic xfeatures (which
> right now means AMX).
>
> The inconsistency isn't problematic because fpu_xstate_prctl() already
> strips out everything except user xfeatures:
>
> case ARCH_GET_XCOMP_PERM:
> /*
> * Lockless snapshot as it can also change right after the
> * dropping the lock.
> */
> permitted = xstate_get_host_group_perm();
> permitted &= XFEATURE_MASK_USER_SUPPORTED;
> return put_user(permitted, uptr);
>
> case ARCH_GET_XCOMP_GUEST_PERM:
> permitted = xstate_get_guest_group_perm();
> permitted &= XFEATURE_MASK_USER_SUPPORTED;
> return put_user(permitted, uptr);
>
> and similarly KVM doesn't apply the __state_perm to supervisor states
> (kvm_get_filtered_xcr0() incorporates xstate_get_guest_group_perm()):
>
> case 0xd: {
> u64 permitted_xcr0 = kvm_get_filtered_xcr0();
> u64 permitted_xss = kvm_caps.supported_xss;
>
> But if KVM in particular were to ever change, dropping supervisor
> permissions would result in subtle bugs in KVM's reporting of supported
> CPUID settings. And the above behavior also means that having supervisor
> xfeatures in __state_perm is correctly handled by all users.
>
> Dropping supervisor permissions also creates another landmine for KVM. If
> more dynamic user xfeatures are ever added, requesting access to multiple
> xfeatures in separate ARCH_REQ_XCOMP_GUEST_PERM calls will result in the
> second invocation of __xstate_request_perm() computing the wrong ksize, as
> as the mask passed to xstate_calculate_size() would not contain *any*
> supervisor features.
>
> Commit 781c64bfcb73 ("x86/fpu/xstate: Handle supervisor states in XSTATE
> permissions") fudged around the size issue for userspace FPUs, but for
> reasons unknown skipped guest FPUs. Lack of a fix for KVM "works" only
> because KVM doesn't yet support virtualizing features that have supervisor
> xfeatures, i.e. as of today, KVM guest FPUs will never need the relevant
> xfeatures.
>
> Simply extending the hack-a-fix for guests would temporarily solve the
> ksize issue, but wouldn't address the inconsistency issue and would leave
> another lurking pitfall for KVM. KVM support for virtualizing CET will
> likely add CET_KERNEL as a guest-only xfeature, i.e. CET_KERNEL will not
> be set in xfeatures_mask_supervisor() and would again be dropped when
> granting access to dynamic xfeatures.
>
> Note, the existing clobbering behavior is rather subtle. The @permitted
> parameter to __xstate_request_perm() comes from:
>
> permitted = xstate_get_group_perm(guest);
>
> which is either fpu->guest_perm.__state_perm or fpu->perm.__state_perm,
> where __state_perm is initialized to:
>
> fpu->perm.__state_perm = fpu_kernel_cfg.default_features;
>
> and copied to the guest side of things:
>
> /* Same defaults for guests */
> fpu->guest_perm = fpu->perm;
>
> fpu_kernel_cfg.default_features contains everything except the dynamic
> xfeatures, i.e. everything except XFEATURE_MASK_XTILE_DATA:
>
> fpu_kernel_cfg.default_features = fpu_kernel_cfg.max_features;
> fpu_kernel_cfg.default_features &= ~XFEATURE_MASK_USER_DYNAMIC;
>
> When __xstate_request_perm() restricts the local "mask" variable to
> compute the user state size:
>
> mask &= XFEATURE_MASK_USER_SUPPORTED;
> usize = xstate_calculate_size(mask, false);
>
> it subtly overwrites the target __state_perm with "mask" containing only
> user xfeatures:
>
> perm = guest ? &fpu->guest_perm : &fpu->perm;
> /* Pairs with the READ_ONCE() in xstate_get_group_perm() */
> WRITE_ONCE(perm->__state_perm, mask);
>
> Cc: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
> Cc: Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
> Cc: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
> Cc: John Allen <john.allen@....com>
> Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZTqgzZl-reO1m01I@google.com
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
> Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
The code change looks reasonable to me.
While the changelog is a bit TL;DR, I understand and respect the intent
to keep the full context, especially given the KVM maintainer's
preference. So, feel free to add my tag:
Reviewed-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists