[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6be7de70-c6d7-41d8-8c68-ece3c3930425@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 13:54:05 -0700
From: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
To: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<dave.hansen@...el.com>, <seanjc@...gle.com>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>
CC: <peterz@...radead.org>, <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
<weijiang.yang@...el.com>, <john.allen@....com>, <bp@...en8.de>,
<xin3.li@...el.com>, Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar
<mingo@...hat.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "H. Peter
Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>, "Mitchell
Levy" <levymitchell0@...il.com>, Stanislav Spassov <stanspas@...zon.de>,
"Eric Biggers" <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] x86/fpu: Drop @perm from guest pseudo FPU
container
On 4/18/2025 1:51 PM, Chang S. Bae wrote:
> if (xstate_get_guest_group_perm() & FPU_GUEST_PERM_LOCKED)
> fpu_lock_guest_permissions();
Sorry, this should be:
if (!(xstate_get_guest_group_perm() & FPU_GUEST_PERM_LOCKED))
fpu_lock_guest_permissions();
Powered by blists - more mailing lists