[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a0743fa8-7676-4930-b9de-73650b577bd9@paulmck-laptop>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 15:45:04 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>, rcu <rcu@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kselftest <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
rust-for-linux <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>,
llvm <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [12/14] torture: Add testing of RCU's Rust bindings to torture.sh
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 10:29:19PM -0000, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Hello, Paul,
>
> On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 22:26:17 GMT, "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 08:32:46PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 8:04 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> wrot
> > e:
> > > >
> > > > Suppose we fired up a guest OS and captured the console output. Is ther
> > e
> > > > a way to make that guest OS shut down automatically at the end of the
> > > > test and to extract the test results?
> > >
> > > Ah, sorry, I thought you were already doing something like that, i.e.
> > > that perhaps you could reuse some kernel build you already had and
> > > avoiding a full rebuild/mrproper. The KUnit Python script uses QEMU
> > > and parses the results; e.g. you could look for the results lines
> > > like:
> > >
> > > # Totals: pass:133 fail:0 skip:0 total:133
> > > ok 2 rust_doctests_kernel
> >
> > Alternatively, I could clone a copy of the current archive into a
> > temporary directory, "make mrproper" there, run kunit normally, then
> > clean up the temporary directory. Extra storage, but quite a bit
> > more robust and user-friendly.
>
> Just to be on the same page, is the concern about the
> slowness of mrproper or that it kills the kernel build
> artifacts requiring a clean build?
It blows away things like tags and cscope databases. Me, I have my
cscope databases elsewhere, but lots of people build them for their
live git repos. And they are (quite understandably) unhappy when their
source-code browsing tools are blown away by some random test doing an
unsuspected "make mrproper". ;-)
> What kind of improvement are we looking for and why would
> this patch in its current form not work?
For the near term, I am OK with its current form because it is
non-default. Longer term, though, we need it to be tested by default,
and that means making it avoid undoing people's work. My short-term
approach is to enable this test on my employer's test systems, which
have Rust set up correctly, and skip it on my laptop, which has a strange
FrankenRust due to my early playing around with that language.
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists