[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b26e8dc2-ab0e-4d68-aaa1-5c2353f2ef52@nvidia.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2025 18:24:56 -0400
From: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>
To: paulmck@...nel.org
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>, Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
rcu <rcu@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kselftest
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
rust-for-linux <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>, llvm <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [12/14] torture: Add testing of RCU's Rust bindings to torture.sh
Hi Paul,
On 4/18/2025 6:45 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>>>> Suppose we fired up a guest OS and captured the console output. Is there
>>>>> a way to make that guest OS shut down automatically at the end of the
>>>>> test and to extract the test results?
>>>> Ah, sorry, I thought you were already doing something like that, i.e.
>>>> that perhaps you could reuse some kernel build you already had and
>>>> avoiding a full rebuild/mrproper. The KUnit Python script uses QEMU
>>>> and parses the results; e.g. you could look for the results lines
>>>> like:
>>>>
>>>> # Totals: pass:133 fail:0 skip:0 total:133
>>>> ok 2 rust_doctests_kernel
>>>>
>>> Alternatively, I could clone a copy of the current archive into a
>>> temporary directory, "make mrproper" there, run kunit normally, then
>>> clean up the temporary directory. Extra storage, but quite a bit
>>> more robust and user-friendly.
>>>
>> Just to be on the same page, is the concern about the
>> slowness of mrproper or that it kills the kernel build
>> artifacts requiring a clean build?
>
> It blows away things like tags and cscope databases. Me, I have my
> cscope databases elsewhere, but lots of people build them for their
> live git repos. And they are (quite understandably) unhappy when their
> source-code browsing tools are blown away by some random test doing an
> unsuspected "make mrproper". 😉
Cool. One thing is, running other test modes in torture.sh also reconfigures the
kernel and potentially recompiles the entire kernel as a result. So if someone
is already having their own kernel build, running torture.sh already may cause
them to have to do a full rebuild, AFAICS. But yes, and to your point, the
cscope DB and stuff may get blown away for additional disruption.
>
>> What kind of improvement are we looking for and why would
>> this patch in its current form not work?
> For the near term, I am OK with its current form because it is
> non-default. Longer term, though, we need it to be tested by default,
> and that means making it avoid undoing people's work. My short-term
> approach is to enable this test on my employer's test systems, which
> have Rust set up correctly, and skip it on my laptop, which has a strange
> FrankenRust due to my early playing around with that language.
>
Or we teach kunit.py to not require a mrproper? :-) I wonder why it needs to do
that. I may run into that too considering my other kernel project requires me to
mess around with rust.
thanks,
- Joel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists