[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aAJMFjm82QgpNHAu@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 14:56:54 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [tip: x86/urgent] x86/cpu/amd: Fix workaround for erratum 1054
* Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 02:37:13PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 02:11:44PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > No, it doesn't really 'need' a stable tag, it has a Fixes tag already,
> > > which gets processed by the -stable team.
>
> NOOOOOO!!!!
Noted!! :-)
> So please ALWAYS use cc: stable@ on patches you know you want to be
> applied to stable trees. Use the Fixes: tag to tell us how far back
> to backport them. That's it. Use both.
Undertood!
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists