linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/core: Fix broken throttling when max_samples_per

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250418131056.GF17910@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 15:10:56 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Qing Wang <wangqing7171@...il.com>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
	alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, irogers@...gle.com,
	jolsa@...nel.org, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
	mark.rutland@....com, mingo@...hat.com, namhyung@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/core: Fix broken throttling when
 max_samples_per_tick=1

On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 09:08:30PM +0800, Qing Wang wrote:
> Thank you very much for your review. Do you need me to reorganize the patch
> and send it out? Because if only the second patch is accepted, its context
> won't match the current mainline code.

I've stomped on it a bit and pushed out to queue/perf/core.

If all looks well, and the robots don't have a fit because I failed to
compile test the thing, it should eventually make its way into tip.