linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/core: Fix broken throttling when max_samples_per

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c25c7155-400e-4cf0-ba56-49759e4c31f5@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 21:19:34 +0800
From: Qing Wang <wangqing7171@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
 alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, irogers@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
 kan.liang@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, mark.rutland@....com, mingo@...hat.com,
 namhyung@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/core: Fix broken throttling when
 max_samples_per_tick=1

Thank you again. This has kick-started my journey of contributing to the 
Linux Kernel community, and it's really awesome.

On 4/18/2025 9:10 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> I've stomped on it a bit and pushed out to queue/perf/core.
>
> If all looks well, and the robots don't have a fit because I failed to
> compile test the thing, it should eventually make its way into tip.