[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <shhqkx5vt5dwbw452yf5cq6gubgcrqpzw6xatyo2m7laogg7gv@xpnspwe5x7ds>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2025 15:35:06 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: Hans Zhang <18255117159@....com>
Cc: lpieralisi@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com, robh@...nel.org,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, s-vadapalli@...com, thomas.richard@...tlin.com,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rockswang7@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND] PCI: cadence: Fix runtime atomic count underflow.
On Sat, Mar 01, 2025 at 08:44:18PM +0800, Hans Zhang wrote:
> From: "Hans Zhang" <18255117159@....com>
>
> If the pci_host_probe fails to be executed and run one time
> pm_runtime_put_sync. Run pm_runtime_put_sync or pm_runtime_put again in
> cdns_plat_pcie_probe or j721e_pcie_probe. Finally, it will print log
> "runtime PM usage count underflow!".
>
Please reword the description as:
"If the call to pci_host_probe() in cdns_pcie_host_setup() fails, PM runtime
count is decremented in the error path using pm_runtime_put_sync(). But the
runtime count is not incremented by this driver, but only by the callers
(cdns_plat_pcie_probe/j721e_pcie_probe). And the callers also decrement the
runtime PM count in their error path. So this leads to the below warning from
the PM core:
runtime PM usage count underflow!
So fix it by getting rid of pm_runtime_put_sync() in the error path and directly
return the errno."
> Signed-off-by: Hans Zhang <18255117159@....com>
Fixes tag?
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-host.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-host.c
> index 8af95e9da7ce..fe0b8d76005e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-host.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-host.c
> @@ -576,8 +576,6 @@ int cdns_pcie_host_setup(struct cdns_pcie_rc *rc)
>
> return 0;
>
> - err_init:
> - pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
> -
> +err_init:
> return ret;
You can now directly do 'return ret' instead of using label.
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
Powered by blists - more mailing lists