[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250419115157.567249-1-cem@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2025 13:51:46 +0200
From: cem@...nel.org
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Hans.Holmberg@....com,
oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
hch@....de,
lukas@...ner.de,
angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com,
Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH] math.h: Account for 64-bit division on i386
From: Carlos Maiolino <cem@...nel.org>
Building linux on i386 might fail if a 64bit type is passed to
mult_fract(). To prevent the failure, use do_div() for the division
calculation instead of hardcoding a / b.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@...hat.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202504181233.F7D9Atra-lkp@intel.com/
---
I'm sending it as a RFC because I didn't to extensive testing on this
patch, also I'm not sure if mult_frac() was intended to work on 32-bit
only types. If that's the case, perhaps, a new mult_frac64() might be a
better idea?!
include/linux/math.h | 19 ++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/math.h b/include/linux/math.h
index 0198c92cbe3e..05ea853b75b4 100644
--- a/include/linux/math.h
+++ b/include/linux/math.h
@@ -133,15 +133,16 @@ __STRUCT_FRACT(u32)
#undef __STRUCT_FRACT
/* Calculate "x * n / d" without unnecessary overflow or loss of precision. */
-#define mult_frac(x, n, d) \
-({ \
- typeof(x) x_ = (x); \
- typeof(n) n_ = (n); \
- typeof(d) d_ = (d); \
- \
- typeof(x_) q = x_ / d_; \
- typeof(x_) r = x_ % d_; \
- q * n_ + r * n_ / d_; \
+#define mult_frac(x, n, d) \
+({ \
+ typeof(x) x_ = (x); \
+ typeof(n) n_ = (n); \
+ typeof(d) d_ = (d); \
+ \
+ typeof(x_) r = do_div(x_, d_); \
+ r *= n_; \
+ do_div(r, d_); \
+ x_ * n_ + r; \
})
#define sector_div(a, b) do_div(a, b)
--
2.49.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists