linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j784s4-j742s2-main-common: Enable ACSPCIE output for PCIe1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a64ebeae-c05b-4228-9714-308d655ca383@ti.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2025 20:03:49 +0530
From: "Kumar, Udit" <u-kumar1@...com>
To: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>, <nm@...com>, <vigneshr@...com>,
        <kristo@...nel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        <conor+dt@...nel.org>
CC: <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <srk@...com>,
        <u-kumar1@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j784s4-j742s2-main-common:
 Enable ACSPCIE output for PCIe1


On 4/11/2025 5:43 PM, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> The PCIe reference clock required by the PCIe Endpoints connected to the
> PCIe connector corresponding to the PCIe1 instance of PCIe on J784S4-EVM
> and J742S2-EVM is driven by the ACSPCIE module. Add the device-tree support
> for enabling the same.

Please check once if you want to enable PCIe ref clock on AM69 as well.

unlike EVM, this clock is terminated on test point.

Thanks

Udit

> Signed-off-by: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>
> ---
>
> Hello,
>
> This patch is based on linux-next tagged next-20250411.
> The v2 patch is at:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241209085157.1203168-1-s-vadapalli@ti.com/
> No changes since v2. The dtbs_check warnings are no longer seen with
> next-20250411 and no changes were required to the patch itself to fix
> the warnings. Hence the patch has been marked with a RESEND tag.
>
> Regards,
> Siddharth.
> [..]