[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250421115214.5720a8cc@jic23-huawei>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 11:52:14 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Michael Hennerich
<Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>, Antoniu Miclaus
<antoniu.miclaus@...log.com>, Ramona Gradinariu
<ramona.gradinariu@...log.com>, Robert Budai <robert.budai@...log.com>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>, Andreas Klinger
<ak@...klinger.de>, Petre Rodan <petre.rodan@...dimension.ro>, Jonathan
Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] iio: more timestamp alignment
On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 11:17:12 -0500
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com> wrote:
> Wile reviewing [1], I noticed a few more cases where we can use
> aligned_s64 or need __aligned(8) on data structures used with
> iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp().
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20250413103443.2420727-1-jic23@kernel.org/
>
Applied to the fixes-togreg branch of iio.git and marked for stable.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Dropped patches that were already applied.
> - Added Fixes tags.
> - Dropped the (insufficient) bmc150-accel fix that snuck in the adis16550 patch.
> - Expand mprls0025pa patch to remove struct mpr_chan.
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250417-iio-more-timestamp-alignment-v1-0-eafac1e22318@baylibre.com
>
> ---
> David Lechner (2):
> iio: imu: adis16550: align buffers for timestamp
> iio: pressure: mprls0025pa: use aligned_s64 for timestamp
>
> drivers/iio/imu/adis16550.c | 2 +-
> drivers/iio/pressure/mprls0025pa.h | 17 ++++++-----------
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: 52d349884738c346961e153f195f4c7fe186fcf4
> change-id: 20250416-iio-more-timestamp-alignment-6c6c6a87ebda
>
> Best regards,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists