[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250421132914.7a456dac@jic23-huawei>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 13:29:14 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Gabriel Shahrouzi <gshahrouzi@...il.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, lars@...afoo.de, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, sonic.zhang@...log.com, vapier@...too.org,
skhan@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linux.dev,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] staging: iio: adc: ad7816: Allow channel 7 for
all devices
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 21:49:06 -0400
Gabriel Shahrouzi <gshahrouzi@...il.com> wrote:
> According to the datasheet on page 9 under the channel selection table,
> all devices (AD7816/7/8) are able to use the channel marked as 7. This
> channel is used for diagnostic purposes by routing the internal 1.23V
> bandgap source through the MUX to the input of the ADC.
>
> Modify the channel validation logic to permit channel 7 for all
> supported device types.
>
> Fixes: 7924425db04a ("staging: iio: adc: new driver for AD7816 devices")
Adding a missing channel is not a fix. It is a feature enhancement.
Not appropriate for backporting in general (though obviously someone wanting
to use it might do so).
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Shahrouzi <gshahrouzi@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7816.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7816.c b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7816.c
> index 6c14d7bcdd675..a44b0c8c82b12 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7816.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7816.c
> @@ -190,11 +190,11 @@ static ssize_t ad7816_store_channel(struct device *dev,
> dev_err(&chip->spi_dev->dev, "Invalid channel id %lu for %s.\n",
> data, indio_dev->name);
> return -EINVAL;
> - } else if (strcmp(indio_dev->name, "ad7818") == 0 && data > 1) {
> + } else if (strcmp(indio_dev->name, "ad7818") == 0 && data > 1 && data != AD7816_CS_MASK) {
Why use the mask? I think this is something entirely unrelated that just happens to have
the value 7.
> dev_err(&chip->spi_dev->dev,
> "Invalid channel id %lu for ad7818.\n", data);
> return -EINVAL;
> - } else if (strcmp(indio_dev->name, "ad7816") == 0 && data > 0) {
> + } else if (strcmp(indio_dev->name, "ad7816") == 0 && data > 0 && data != AD7816_CS_MASK) {
> dev_err(&chip->spi_dev->dev,
> "Invalid channel id %lu for ad7816.\n", data);
> return -EINVAL;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists