linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] iio: adis16201: Correct inclinometer channel resolution

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKUZ0zLk8OCgUUVpcFRygpY+iDYjm-=8kHpoosZJpAtyyeL0AQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 10:16:04 -0400
From: Gabriel Shahrouzi <gshahrouzi@...il.com>
To: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@...il.com>
Cc: jic23@...nel.org, lars@...afoo.de, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, 
	skhan@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linux.dev, 
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adis16201: Correct inclinometer channel resolution

On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 10:06 AM Marcelo Schmitt
<marcelo.schmitt1@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On 04/21, Gabriel Shahrouzi wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 9:48 AM Marcelo Schmitt
> > <marcelo.schmitt1@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 04/21, Gabriel Shahrouzi wrote:
> > > > The inclinometer channels were previously defined with 14 realbits.
> > > > However, the ADIS16201 datasheet states the resolution for these output
> > > > channels is 12 bits (Page 14, text description; Page 15, table 7).
> > > >
> > > > Correct the realbits value to 12 to accurately reflect the hardware.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: f7fe1d1dd5a5 ("staging: iio: new adis16201 driver")
> > > > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > > > Signed-off-by: Gabriel Shahrouzi <gshahrouzi@...il.com>
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@...il.com>
> > Should I have included the reviewed-by tag on the latest patch sent in
> > this thread since there were no changes to the code?
>
> Not sure I had given a review tag for this.
Ah it's probably because I resent the patch in the same thread.
> Hard to find the previous versrion because it doesn't seem to contain adis16201
> in the subject name :/
> Anyway, good thing the fix should be added to IIO now.
>
> Regards,
> Marcelo