[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7c685f63-65ac-4817-9bd9-365e307eb965@163.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 19:51:51 +0800
From: Hans Zhang <18255117159@....com>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>
Cc: lpieralisi@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
heiko@...ech.de, manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org,
jingoohan1@...il.com, shawn.lin@...k-chips.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: dw-rockchip: Reorganize register and bitfield
definitions
On 2025/4/22 19:47, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 07:28:29PM +0800, Hans Zhang wrote:
>> Register definitions were scattered with ambiguous names (e.g.,
>> PCIE_RDLH_LINK_UP_CHGED in PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_MISC) and lacked
>> hierarchical grouping. Magic values for bit operations reduced code
>> clarity.
>>
>> Group registers and their associated bitfields logically. This improves
>> maintainability and aligns the code with hardware documentation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans Zhang <18255117159@....com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c | 42 +++++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
>> index fd5827bbfae3..cdc8afc6cfc1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
>> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>> * Author: Simon Xue <xxm@...k-chips.com>
>> */
>>
>> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
>> #include <linux/clk.h>
>> #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
>> #include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
>> @@ -34,30 +35,35 @@
>>
>> #define to_rockchip_pcie(x) dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
>>
>> -#define PCIE_CLIENT_RC_MODE HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(0x40)
>> -#define PCIE_CLIENT_EP_MODE HIWORD_UPDATE(0xf0, 0x0)
>> -#define PCIE_CLIENT_ENABLE_LTSSM HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(0xc)
>> -#define PCIE_CLIENT_DISABLE_LTSSM HIWORD_UPDATE(0x0c, 0x8)
>> -#define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_MSG_RX 0x04
>> +#define PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CONTROL 0x0
>> +#define PCIE_CLIENT_RC_MODE HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(0x40)
>> +#define PCIE_CLIENT_EP_MODE HIWORD_UPDATE(0xf0, 0x0)
>> +#define PCIE_CLIENT_ENABLE_LTSSM HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(0xc)
>> +#define PCIE_CLIENT_DISABLE_LTSSM HIWORD_UPDATE(0x0c, 0x8)
>> +
>> +#define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_MSG_RX 0x4
>> +#define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_LEGACY 0x8
>> +
>> #define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_MISC 0x10
>> +#define PCIE_RDLH_LINK_UP_CHGED BIT(1)
>> +#define PCIE_LINK_REQ_RST_NOT_INT BIT(2)
>> +
>> +#define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_MASK_LEGACY 0x1c
>> #define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_MASK_MISC 0x24
>> +
>> #define PCIE_CLIENT_POWER 0x2c
>> +#define PME_READY_ENTER_L23 BIT(3)
>> +
>> #define PCIE_CLIENT_MSG_GEN 0x34
>> -#define PME_READY_ENTER_L23 BIT(3)
>> -#define PME_TURN_OFF (BIT(4) | BIT(20))
>> -#define PME_TO_ACK (BIT(9) | BIT(25))
>> -#define PCIE_SMLH_LINKUP BIT(16)
>> -#define PCIE_RDLH_LINKUP BIT(17)
>> -#define PCIE_LINKUP (PCIE_SMLH_LINKUP | PCIE_RDLH_LINKUP)
>> -#define PCIE_RDLH_LINK_UP_CHGED BIT(1)
>> -#define PCIE_LINK_REQ_RST_NOT_INT BIT(2)
>> -#define PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CONTROL 0x0
>> -#define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_LEGACY 0x8
>> -#define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_MASK_LEGACY 0x1c
>> +#define PME_TURN_OFF HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(BIT(4))
>> +#define PME_TO_ACK HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(BIT(9))
>> +
>> #define PCIE_CLIENT_HOT_RESET_CTRL 0x180
>> +#define PCIE_LTSSM_ENABLE_ENHANCE BIT(4)
>> +
>> #define PCIE_CLIENT_LTSSM_STATUS 0x300
>> -#define PCIE_LTSSM_ENABLE_ENHANCE BIT(4)
>> -#define PCIE_LTSSM_STATUS_MASK GENMASK(5, 0)
>> +#define PCIE_LINKUP_MASK GENMASK(17, 16)
>
> Here you are adding a macro (PCIE_LINKUP_MASK) that is not used.
>
> I suggest that you move the addition to the patch where it is actually used.
>
Hi Niklas,
Thank you very much for your reply. Will change.
Best regards,
Hans
Powered by blists - more mailing lists