[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aAeKcEfyDS1ImynJ@ryzen>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 14:24:16 +0200
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>
To: Hans Zhang <18255117159@....com>
Cc: lpieralisi@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
heiko@...ech.de, manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org,
jingoohan1@...il.com, shawn.lin@...k-chips.com,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] PCI: dw-rockchip: Unify link status checks with
FIELD_GET
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 07:50:50PM +0800, Hans Zhang wrote:
>
>
> On 2025/4/22 19:39, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 07:28:30PM +0800, Hans Zhang wrote:
> > > Link-up detection manually checked PCIE_LINKUP bits across RC/EP modes,
> > > leading to code duplication. Centralize the logic using FIELD_GET. This
> > > removes redundancy and abstracts hardware-specific bit masking, ensuring
> > > consistent link state handling.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Hans Zhang <18255117159@....com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c | 15 +++++----------
> > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> > > index cdc8afc6cfc1..2b26060af5c2 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> > > @@ -196,10 +196,7 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> > > struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = to_rockchip_pcie(pci);
> > > u32 val = rockchip_pcie_get_ltssm(rockchip);
> > > - if ((val & PCIE_LINKUP) == PCIE_LINKUP)
> > > - return 1;
> > > -
> > > - return 0;
> > > + return FIELD_GET(PCIE_LINKUP_MASK, val) == 3;
> >
> > While I like the idea of your patch, here you are replacing something that
> > is easy to read (PCIE_LINKUP) with a magic value, which IMO is a step in
> > the wrong direction.
> >
>
> Hi Niklas,
>
> Thank you very much for your reply. How about I add another macro
> definition?
>
> #define PCIE_LINKUP 3
Yes, adding another macro for it is what I meant.
Kind regards,
Niklas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists