[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bbc8126a-ec48-4b8e-a8dd-3cab7a60a6a7@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 12:38:51 -0700
From: ross.philipson@...cle.com
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: dpsmith@...rtussolutions.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
ardb@...nel.org, mjg59@...f.ucam.org,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, peterhuewe@....de,
jarkko@...nel.org, jgg@...pe.ca, luto@...capital.net,
nivedita@...m.mit.edu, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
davem@...emloft.net, corbet@....net, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
dwmw2@...radead.org, baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com,
kanth.ghatraju@...cle.com, andrew.cooper3@...rix.com,
trenchboot-devel@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 09/19] x86: Secure Launch kernel early boot stub
On 4/21/25 6:18 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 4/21/25 09:27, Ross Philipson wrote:
>> +static u64 sl_rdmsr(u32 reg)
>> +{
>> + u64 lo, hi;
>> +
>> + asm volatile ("rdmsr" : "=a" (lo), "=d" (hi) : "c" (reg));
>> +
>> + return (hi << 32) | lo;
>> +}
>
> Is there a reason this code doesn't just use boot_rdmsr()?
No I just didn't know those functions were there. I will fix it.
Thanks
Ross
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists