linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ufs: core: add caps UFSHCD_CAP_MCQ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7619479cd692a5ef8bf3bdb8424d173b774dc146.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 02:55:55 +0000
From: Peter Wang (王信友) <peter.wang@...iatek.com>
To: "avri.altman@....com" <avri.altman@....com>, "ebiggers@...gle.com"
	<ebiggers@...gle.com>, "tanghuan@...o.com" <tanghuan@...o.com>,
	"quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com" <quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com>,
	"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org" <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
	"bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>, "alim.akhtar@...sung.com"
	<alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, "minwoo.im@...sung.com" <minwoo.im@...sung.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
	"James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com"
	<James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
CC: "opensource.kernel@...o.com" <opensource.kernel@...o.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ufs: core: add caps UFSHCD_CAP_MCQ_EN

On Mon, 2025-04-21 at 21:51 +0800, Huan Tang wrote:
> 
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
> 
> 
> Add caps UFSHCD_CAP_MCQ_EN(default enable), then host driver to
> control the on/off of MCQ; Sometimes, we don't want to enable
> MCQ and want to disable it through the host driver, for example,
> ufs-qcom.c .
> 
> Signed-off-by: Huan Tang <tanghuan@...o.com>
> ---


Hi Huan,

This patch of only add a flag and always enables this flag. 
In other words, it is a meaningless patch.
Suggest also uptream the flow of the disable flag patch 
as part of a patch series.

Thanks
Peter