lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f0948adc-8130-4417-8c59-f0b52a7a0e01@baylibre.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 17:37:01 -0500
From: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Nuno Sá
 <nuno.sa@...log.com>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
 Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
 Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
 Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...aro.org>,
 Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
 Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
 Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] iio: introduce IIO_DECLARE_BUFFER_WITH_TS macros

On 4/22/25 5:30 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 1:08 AM David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com> wrote:
>>

...

>> +_Static_assert(sizeof(IIO_DMA_MINALIGN) % sizeof(s64) == 0,
> 
> Why not static_assert() ? Because of the message? But static_assert()
> supports messages AFAICS.
> 
>> +       "macros above assume that IIO_DMA_MINALIGN also ensures s64 timestamp alignment");
> 

I just knew that was standard C. But I support BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG or static_assert
would work just as well here.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ