[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55f8a997-77e7-4d07-aec2-8d20f56314d0@baylibre.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 17:41:03 -0500
From: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Nuno Sá
<nuno.sa@...log.com>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...aro.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] iio: adc: ad7380: use IIO_DECLARE_BUFFER_WITH_TS
On 4/22/25 5:33 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 1:08 AM David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com> wrote:
>>
>> Use IIO_DECLARE_BUFFER_WITH_TS to declare the buffer that gets used with
>> iio_push_to_buffers_with_ts(). This makes the code a bit easier to read
>> and understand.
>
> ...
>
>> + IIO_DECLARE_BUFFER_WITH_TS(u8, scan_data, MAX_NUM_CHANNELS * sizeof(u32))
>
> Btw, why not DECLARE_IIO_...() as other DECLARE_*() look like?
IMHO, namespace should always go first and people who write DECLARE_NS_... are
doing it wrong. :-)
There is not existing DECLARE_IIO_ to match anyway.
>
>> + __aligned(IIO_DMA_MINALIGN);
>
> Forgot to drop and use the DMA variant?
>
oops!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists