[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<PH7PR16MB619679B002E0AB4CD28CE93DE5BB2@PH7PR16MB6196.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 06:57:25 +0000
From: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@...disk.com>
To: Huan Tang <tanghuan@...o.com>, "peter.wang@...iatek.com"
<peter.wang@...iatek.com>
CC: "James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com"
<James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>, "alim.akhtar@...sung.com"
<alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, "avri.altman@....com" <avri.altman@....com>,
"bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>, "ebiggers@...gle.com"
<ebiggers@...gle.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, "manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org"
<manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>, "martin.petersen@...cle.com"
<martin.petersen@...cle.com>, "minwoo.im@...sung.com"
<minwoo.im@...sung.com>, "opensource.kernel@...o.com"
<opensource.kernel@...o.com>, "quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com"
<quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ufs: core: add caps UFSHCD_CAP_MCQ_EN
>
> Thanks for you reply!
>
> I found that using low-end UFS in SoCs that support MCQ may cause
>
> device latency to reach extreme values.
Do you mean that the device reports wSpecVersion >= 400 but doesn't really work well with MCQ?
Thanks,
Avri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists