linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/205] 6.1.134-rc2 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2025042236-endeared-mobile-3fb8@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 10:51:43 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
	lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
	f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
	srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
	hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/205] 6.1.134-rc2 review

On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 07:29:38AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 4/9/25 05:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.134 release.
> > There are 205 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Apr 2025 11:58:02 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> 
> Building loongarch:defconfig ... failed
> --------------
> Error log:
> In file included from arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c:7:
> arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.h: In function 'emit_nop':
> arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.h:30:22: error: 'INSN_NOP' undeclared
> 
> Caused by commit e9ccb262b39a ("LoongArch: BPF: Fix off-by-one error
> in build_prologue()"). INSN_NOP was introduced with commit 19e5eb15b00c5
> in v6.2.
> 
> Also, the description of e9ccb262b39a says "With BPF progs mixing bpf2bpf
> and tailcalls...". Support for that was introduced in v6.4 with commit
> bb035ef0cc91 ("LoongArch: BPF: Support mixing bpf2bpf and tailcalls"),
> so I do wonder if e9ccb262b39a was really needed in 6.1.

Thanks for letting me know, now reverted.

greg k-h