[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250422085145.GB14589@1wt.eu>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 10:51:45 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>,
Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/32] kselftest harness and nolibc compatibility
Hi Thomas,
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 10:48:28AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 11:00:24AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > Nolibc is useful for selftests as the test programs can be very small,
> > and compiled with just a kernel crosscompiler, without userspace support.
> > Currently nolibc is only usable with kselftest.h, not the more
> > convenient to use kselftest_harness.h
> > This series provides this compatibility by adding new features to nolibc
> > and removing the usage of problematic features from the harness.
> >
> > The first half of the series are changes to the harness, the second one
> > are for nolibc. Both parts are very independent and should go through
> > different trees.
>
> I need a few nolibc bits of this series (snprintf() and prep patches) to base
> further patches on. For that I'd like to pick up all the nolibc patches from
> this series through the nolibc tree. They got Acks from Willy.
>
> Any objections?
No objection on my side!
Willy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists