linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/32] kselftest harness and nolibc compatibility

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7bb64160-103c-4882-a69b-9bc054e62db8@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 14:06:34 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
 Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>,
 Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Thomas Weißschuh
 <linux@...ssschuh.net>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
 Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/32] kselftest harness and nolibc compatibility

On 4/22/25 02:51, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 10:48:28AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 11:00:24AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
>>> Nolibc is useful for selftests as the test programs can be very small,
>>> and compiled with just a kernel crosscompiler, without userspace support.
>>> Currently nolibc is only usable with kselftest.h, not the more
>>> convenient to use kselftest_harness.h
>>> This series provides this compatibility by adding new features to nolibc
>>> and removing the usage of problematic features from the harness.
>>>
>>> The first half of the series are changes to the harness, the second one
>>> are for nolibc. Both parts are very independent and should go through
>>> different trees.
>>
>> I need a few nolibc bits of this series (snprintf() and prep patches) to base
>> further patches on. For that I'd like to pick up all the nolibc patches from
>> this series through the nolibc tree. They got Acks from Willy.
>>
>> Any objections?
> 
> No objection on my side!
> 

Thanks.

Kees, do you have any comments on this series? If you are okay
with it, I would like to apply this for next.

thanks,
-- Shuah