linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/32] kselftest harness and nolibc compatibility

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <329e186d-50e9-46b6-b0ea-ee22ad6e88cb@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 12:52:56 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
 Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>,
 Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Thomas Weißschuh
 <linux@...ssschuh.net>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
 Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/32] kselftest harness and nolibc compatibility

On 4/24/25 14:06, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 4/22/25 02:51, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 10:48:28AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 11:00:24AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
>>>> Nolibc is useful for selftests as the test programs can be very small,
>>>> and compiled with just a kernel crosscompiler, without userspace support.
>>>> Currently nolibc is only usable with kselftest.h, not the more
>>>> convenient to use kselftest_harness.h
>>>> This series provides this compatibility by adding new features to nolibc
>>>> and removing the usage of problematic features from the harness.
>>>>
>>>> The first half of the series are changes to the harness, the second one
>>>> are for nolibc. Both parts are very independent and should go through
>>>> different trees.
>>>
>>> I need a few nolibc bits of this series (snprintf() and prep patches) to base
>>> further patches on. For that I'd like to pick up all the nolibc patches from
>>> this series through the nolibc tree. They got Acks from Willy.
>>>
>>> Any objections?
>>
>> No objection on my side!
>>
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Kees, do you have any comments on this series? If you are okay
> with it, I would like to apply this for next.
> 

Thomas,

Can this be part of no libc pull request for 6.16-rc1 which I will
be fielding this time around?

If so here is my Ack
Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah