[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aAkDRIqIOjLo7haw@ryzen>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 17:12:04 +0200
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>
To: Hans Zhang <18255117159@....com>
Cc: lpieralisi@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
heiko@...ech.de, manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org,
jingoohan1@...il.com, shawn.lin@...k-chips.com,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] PCI: dw-rockchip: Reorganize register and
bitfield definitions
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 10:14:57PM +0800, Hans Zhang wrote:
> > I can see why you renamed PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CONTROL to PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CON
> > (to match PCIE_CLIENT_MSG_GEN_CON).
> >
> > But now we have PCIE_CLIENT_MSG_GEN_CON / PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CON and
> > PCIE_CLIENT_HOT_RESET_CTRL.
> >
> > _CTRL seems like a more common shortening. How about renaming all three to
> > end with _CTRL ?
>
> I saw that TRM is named like this.
>
> PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CON / PCIE_CLIENT_MSG_GEN_CON /
> PCIE_CLIENT_HOT_RESET_CTRL
>
> Shall we take TRM as the standard or your suggestion?
Aha, so the inconsistency is in the TRM... hahaha :)
Probably best to keep it identical to the TRM.
Kind regards,
Niklas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists