[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9212f2ee-9562-4409-a378-20e41fe30325@163.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 23:23:41 +0800
From: Hans Zhang <18255117159@....com>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>
Cc: lpieralisi@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
heiko@...ech.de, manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org,
jingoohan1@...il.com, shawn.lin@...k-chips.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] PCI: dw-rockchip: Reorganize register and bitfield
definitions
On 2025/4/23 23:12, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 10:14:57PM +0800, Hans Zhang wrote:
>>> I can see why you renamed PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CONTROL to PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CON
>>> (to match PCIE_CLIENT_MSG_GEN_CON).
>>>
>>> But now we have PCIE_CLIENT_MSG_GEN_CON / PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CON and
>>> PCIE_CLIENT_HOT_RESET_CTRL.
>>>
>>> _CTRL seems like a more common shortening. How about renaming all three to
>>> end with _CTRL ?
>>
>> I saw that TRM is named like this.
>>
>> PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CON / PCIE_CLIENT_MSG_GEN_CON /
>> PCIE_CLIENT_HOT_RESET_CTRL
>>
>> Shall we take TRM as the standard or your suggestion?
>
> Aha, so the inconsistency is in the TRM... hahaha :)
>
> Probably best to keep it identical to the TRM.
>
Hi Niklas,
Thank you very much for your reply. Okay.
Best regards,
Hans
Powered by blists - more mailing lists