[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <511373.1745425660@famine>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 09:27:40 -0700
From: Jay Vosburgh <jv@...sburgh.net>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@...dia.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net] bonding: use permanent address for MAC swapping if
device address is same
Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com> wrote:
>On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 10:10:24PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
>> >I'm not familiar with infiniband devices. Can we use eth_random_addr()
>> >to set random addr for infiniband devices? And what about other device
>> >type? Just return error directly?
>>
>> Infiniband devices have fixed MAC addresses that cannot be
>> changed. Bonding permits IB devices only in active-backup mode, and
>> will set fail_over_mac to active (fail_over_mac=follow is not permitted
>> for IB).
>>
>> I don't understand your questions about other device types or
>> errors, could you elaborate?
>>
>
>I mean what if other device type enslaves, other than ethernet or infiniband.
>I'm not sure if we can set random mac address for these devices. Should we
>ignore all none ethernet device or devices that don't support
>ndo_set_mac_address?
Devices without ndo_set_mac_address are already handled; they
are limited to active-backup mode and fail_over_mac is set to active
(just like Infiniband).
I'm not aware of any network device types other than Ethernet
(which to bonding is anything with dev->type == ARPHRD_ETHER) or
Infiniband in use with bonding. If there are any, and the driver
supports ndo_set_mac_address, and it fails for a random MAC if they try
to use fail_over_mac=follow, then I'll look forward to the bug report.
If you're thinking of devices that are type ARPHRD_ETHER but
aren't actual ethernet (virtual devices, veth, et al, perhaps?), then
I'm not sure why those would require fail_over_mac=follow, as its reason
for existence is for multiport devices that can't handle multiple ports
programmed to the same MAC, which shouldn't matter for virtual devices
or single port physical devices.
-J
---
-Jay Vosburgh, jv@...sburgh.net
Powered by blists - more mailing lists