[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0487e0c6-6269-4b23-8bea-3729a04129ba@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 13:07:04 -0700
From: ross.philipson@...cle.com
To: ALOK TIWARI <alok.a.tiwari@...cle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: dpsmith@...rtussolutions.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
ardb@...nel.org, mjg59@...f.ucam.org,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, peterhuewe@....de,
jarkko@...nel.org, jgg@...pe.ca, luto@...capital.net,
nivedita@...m.mit.edu, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
davem@...emloft.net, corbet@....net, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
dwmw2@...radead.org, baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com,
kanth.ghatraju@...cle.com, andrew.cooper3@...rix.com,
trenchboot-devel@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 12/19] kexec: Secure Launch kexec SEXIT support
On 4/23/25 12:58 PM, ALOK TIWARI wrote:
>
>
> On 21-04-2025 21:57, Ross Philipson wrote:
>> Prior to running the next kernel via kexec, the Secure Launch code
>> closes down private SMX resources and does an SEXIT. This allows the
>> next kernel to start normally without any issues starting the APs etc.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ross Philipson <ross.philipson@...cle.com>
>> ---
> [clip]
>> +static inline void smx_getsec_sexit(void)
>> +{
>> + asm volatile ("getsec\n"
>> + : : "a" (SMX_X86_GETSEC_SEXIT));
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Used during kexec and on reboot paths to finalize the TXT state
>> + * and do an SEXIT exiting the DRTM and disabling SMX mode.
>
> 'do an SEXIT exiting', sounds awkward. Changed to 'perform an SEXIT to
> exit' for clarity.
>
>> + */
>> +void slaunch_finalize(int do_sexit)
>> +{
>> + u64 one = TXT_REGVALUE_ONE, val;
>> + void __iomem *config;
>> +
>> + if (!slaunch_is_txt_launch())
>> + return;
>> +
>> + config = ioremap(TXT_PRIV_CONFIG_REGS_BASE, TXT_NR_CONFIG_PAGES *
>> + PAGE_SIZE);
>> + if (!config) {
>> + pr_emerg("Error SEXIT failed to ioremap TXT private reqs\n");
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Clear secrets bit for SEXIT */
>> + memcpy_toio(config + TXT_CR_CMD_NO_SECRETS, &one, sizeof(one));
>> + memcpy_fromio(&val, config + TXT_CR_E2STS, sizeof(val));
>> +
>> + /* Unlock memory configurations */
>> + memcpy_toio(config + TXT_CR_CMD_UNLOCK_MEM_CONFIG, &one,
>> sizeof(one));
>> + memcpy_fromio(&val, config + TXT_CR_E2STS, sizeof(val));
>> +
>> + /* Close the TXT private register space */
>> + memcpy_toio(config + TXT_CR_CMD_CLOSE_PRIVATE, &one, sizeof(one));
>> + memcpy_fromio(&val, config + TXT_CR_E2STS, sizeof(val));
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Calls to iounmap are not being done because of the state of the
>> + * system this late in the kexec process. Local IRQs are disabled
>> and
>> + * iounmap causes a TLB flush which in turn causes a warning.
>> Leaving
>> + * thse mappings is not an issue since the next kernel is going to
>
> typo thse -> these
> "are not being done because of the state of the system" can be
> simplified to "are skipped due to the system state."
> "Calls to iounmap are skipped due to the system state this late in the
> kexec process"
>
>> + * completely re-setup memory management.
>> + */
>> +
>> + /* Map public registers and do a final read fence */
>> + config = ioremap(TXT_PUB_CONFIG_REGS_BASE, TXT_NR_CONFIG_PAGES *
>> + PAGE_SIZE);
>> + if (!config) {
>> + pr_emerg("Error SEXIT failed to ioremap TXT public reqs\n");
>
> reqs or regs ?
> Assuming you meant registers (regs), not requests (reqs)
>
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + memcpy_fromio(&val, config + TXT_CR_E2STS, sizeof(val));
>> +
>> + pr_emerg("TXT clear secrets bit and unlock memory complete.\n");
>> +
>> + if (!do_sexit)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + if (smp_processor_id() != 0)
>> + panic("Error TXT SEXIT must be called on CPU 0\n");
>
> Prefixing with "TXT:"
> 'Error' is redundant — panic() itself implies a fatal error.
> we can use panic("TXT: SEXIT must be called on CPU 0\n");
All good points, we will address these.
Thanks
Ross
>
>> +
>> + /* In case SMX mode was disabled, enable it for SEXIT */
>> + cr4_set_bits(X86_CR4_SMXE);
>> +
>> + /* Do the SEXIT SMX operation */
>> + smx_getsec_sexit();
>> +
>
> Thanks,
> Alok
Powered by blists - more mailing lists