[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aAijRtGLzKLdwP0-@stanley.mountain>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 11:22:30 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Romain Gantois <romain.gantois@...tlin.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH next] misc: ti_fpc202: Fix off by one in probe()
The "port_id" is used as an array index into the struct fpc202_priv
priv->addr_caches[] array in fpc202_write_dev_addr(). It's a 2 by 2
array so if "port_id" is FPC202_NUM_PORTS (2) then it's one element
out of bounds. Change the > to >= to fix this bug.
Fixes: 1e5c9b1efa1c ("misc: add FPC202 dual port controller driver")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
---
drivers/misc/ti_fpc202.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/ti_fpc202.c b/drivers/misc/ti_fpc202.c
index b9c9ee4bfc4e..4e1871870769 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/ti_fpc202.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/ti_fpc202.c
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ static int fpc202_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
goto unregister_chans;
}
- if (port_id > FPC202_NUM_PORTS) {
+ if (port_id >= FPC202_NUM_PORTS) {
dev_err(dev, "port ID %d is out of range!\n", port_id);
ret = -EINVAL;
goto unregister_chans;
--
2.47.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists