lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3bbef5c3-1859-4a4a-b25a-83428dc15e98@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 17:29:44 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>, Bjorn Andersson
 <andersson@...nel.org>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
 Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>,
 Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>,
 Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
 Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/10] Add support for videocc, camcc, dispcc and gpucc
 on Qualcomm QCS615 platform

On 24/04/2025 13:13, Taniya Das wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/24/2025 4:40 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 24/04/2025 11:32, Taniya Das wrote:
>>> Add support for multimedia clock controllers on Qualcomm QCS615 platform.
>>> Update the defconfig to enable these clock controllers.
>>>
>>> Global clock controller support
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241022-qcs615-clock-driver-v4-0-3d716ad0d987@quicinc.com/
>>>
>>> Changes in v8:
>>> - Drop the properties which are already covered as part of gcc.yaml [Krzysztof]
>>> - Drop the RB tag for dt-bindings for Camera clock controller.
>>
>> Why?
> 
> It had comments, so wanted to share the latest RB-by.
So there were some comments and that's the basis to ask to do review
twice? So anyone can comment on anything and you will remove people's
review? I am not going through this again.

Read carefully:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ