[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aAqPQgjgkPNtOElr@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 22:21:38 +0300
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Changyuan Lyu <changyuanl@...gle.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>, Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>,
Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...omium.org>, Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Frank van der Linden <fvdl@...gle.com>,
York Jasper Niebuhr <yjnworkstation@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memblock: mark init_deferred_page as __init_memblock
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 07:29:29PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 06:08:08PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> >
> > On architectures that set CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK, memmap_init_kho_scratch_pages
> > is not discarded but calls a function that is:
> >
> > WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference: memmap_init_kho_scratch_pages+0x120 (section: .text) -> init_deferred_page (section: .init.text)
> > ERROR: modpost: Section mismatches detected.
> > Set CONFIG_SECTION_MISMATCH_WARN_ONLY=y to allow them.
> >
> > Mark init_deferred_page the same way as memmap_init_kho_scratch_pages
> > to avoid that warning. Unfortunately this requires marking additional
> > functions the same way to have them stay around as well.
> >
> > Ideally memmap_init_kho_scratch_pages would become __meminit instead
> > of __init_memblock, but I could not convince myself that this is safe.
>
> It should be __init even, as well as a few other kho-memblock
> functions.
> I'll run some builds to make sure I'm not missing anything.
Yeah, it looks like everything inside CONFIG_MEMBLOCK_KHO_SCRATCH can be
just __init unconditionally:
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index 44d3bacf86a0..994792829ebe 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -942,17 +942,17 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_physmem_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMBLOCK_KHO_SCRATCH
-__init_memblock void memblock_set_kho_scratch_only(void)
+__init void memblock_set_kho_scratch_only(void)
{
kho_scratch_only = true;
}
-__init_memblock void memblock_clear_kho_scratch_only(void)
+__init void memblock_clear_kho_scratch_only(void)
{
kho_scratch_only = false;
}
-void __init_memblock memmap_init_kho_scratch_pages(void)
+__init void memmap_init_kho_scratch_pages(void)
{
phys_addr_t start, end;
unsigned long pfn;
> > Fixes: 1b7936623970 ("memblock: introduce memmap_init_kho_scratch()")
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > ---
> > mm/internal.h | 7 ++++---
> > mm/mm_init.c | 8 ++++----
> > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
> > index 838f840ded83..40464f755092 100644
> > --- a/mm/internal.h
> > +++ b/mm/internal.h
> > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> >
> > #include <linux/fs.h>
> > #include <linux/khugepaged.h>
> > +#include <linux/memblock.h>
> > #include <linux/mm.h>
> > #include <linux/mm_inline.h>
> > #include <linux/pagemap.h>
> > @@ -543,7 +544,7 @@ extern int defrag_mode;
> >
> > void setup_per_zone_wmarks(void);
> > void calculate_min_free_kbytes(void);
> > -int __meminit init_per_zone_wmark_min(void);
> > +int __init_memblock init_per_zone_wmark_min(void);
> > void page_alloc_sysctl_init(void);
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -1532,9 +1533,9 @@ static inline bool pte_needs_soft_dirty_wp(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pte_t pte
> > return vma_soft_dirty_enabled(vma) && !pte_soft_dirty(pte);
> > }
> >
> > -void __meminit __init_single_page(struct page *page, unsigned long pfn,
> > +void __init_memblock __init_single_page(struct page *page, unsigned long pfn,
> > unsigned long zone, int nid);
> > -void __meminit __init_page_from_nid(unsigned long pfn, int nid);
> > +void __init_memblock __init_page_from_nid(unsigned long pfn, int nid);
> >
> > /* shrinker related functions */
> > unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> > diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c
> > index 7bb5f77cf195..31cf8bc31cc2 100644
> > --- a/mm/mm_init.c
> > +++ b/mm/mm_init.c
> > @@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ static void __init find_zone_movable_pfns_for_nodes(void)
> > node_states[N_MEMORY] = saved_node_state;
> > }
> >
> > -void __meminit __init_single_page(struct page *page, unsigned long pfn,
> > +void __init_memblock __init_single_page(struct page *page, unsigned long pfn,
> > unsigned long zone, int nid)
> > {
> > mm_zero_struct_page(page);
> > @@ -669,7 +669,7 @@ static inline void fixup_hashdist(void) {}
> > /*
> > * Initialize a reserved page unconditionally, finding its zone first.
> > */
> > -void __meminit __init_page_from_nid(unsigned long pfn, int nid)
> > +void __init_memblock __init_page_from_nid(unsigned long pfn, int nid)
> > {
> > pg_data_t *pgdat;
> > int zid;
> > @@ -744,7 +744,7 @@ defer_init(int nid, unsigned long pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> > return false;
> > }
> >
> > -static void __meminit __init_deferred_page(unsigned long pfn, int nid)
> > +static void __init_memblock __init_deferred_page(unsigned long pfn, int nid)
> > {
> > if (early_page_initialised(pfn, nid))
> > return;
> > @@ -769,7 +769,7 @@ static inline void __init_deferred_page(unsigned long pfn, int nid)
> > }
> > #endif /* CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT */
> >
> > -void __meminit init_deferred_page(unsigned long pfn, int nid)
> > +void __init_memblock init_deferred_page(unsigned long pfn, int nid)
> > {
> > __init_deferred_page(pfn, nid);
> > }
> > --
> > 2.39.5
> >
>
> --
> Sincerely yours,
> Mike.
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists