[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <7fcb9e20-fd7e-4b59-9187-8993b3b163fe@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 23:28:56 +0200
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Mike Rapoport" <rppt@...nel.org>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Changyuan Lyu" <changyuanl@...gle.com>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@...hat.com>, "Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Matthew Wilcox" <willy@...radead.org>,
"Lorenzo Stoakes" <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
"Kefeng Wang" <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
"Ryan Roberts" <ryan.roberts@....com>, "Barry Song" <baohua@...nel.org>,
"Jeff Xu" <jeffxu@...omium.org>, "Wei Yang" <richard.weiyang@...il.com>,
"Baoquan He" <bhe@...hat.com>, "Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@...gle.com>,
"Frank van der Linden" <fvdl@...gle.com>,
"York Jasper Niebuhr" <yjnworkstation@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memblock: mark init_deferred_page as __init_memblock
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025, at 21:21, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 07:29:29PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 06:08:08PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> It should be __init even, as well as a few other kho-memblock
>> functions.
>> I'll run some builds to make sure I'm not missing anything.
>
> Yeah, it looks like everything inside CONFIG_MEMBLOCK_KHO_SCRATCH can be
> just __init unconditionally:
Right, I tried the same patch after your earlier comments and agree
this is better than my patch.
Tested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists