linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] dt-bindings: pci: cadence: Extend compatible for new EP configurations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b25406dc-affd-48f2-bccb-48ee01bdfcf1@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 18:21:50 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Hans Zhang <hans.zhang@...tech.com>, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
 Manikandan Karunakaran Pillai <mpillai@...ence.com>
Cc: "bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
 "lpieralisi@...nel.org" <lpieralisi@...nel.org>, "kw@...ux.com"
 <kw@...ux.com>,
 "manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org" <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
 "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>, "krzk+dt@...nel.org"
 <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, "conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 "peter.chen@...tech.com" <peter.chen@...tech.com>,
 "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
 "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] dt-bindings: pci: cadence: Extend compatible for
 new EP configurations

On 25/04/2025 17:33, Hans Zhang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2025/4/25 22:48, Conor Dooley wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 02:19:11AM +0000, Manikandan Karunakaran Pillai wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 04:29:35PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 09:04:41AM +0800,hans.zhang@...tech.com  wrote:
>>>>>> From: Manikandan K Pillai<mpillai@...ence.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Document the compatible property for HPA (High Performance
>>>> Architecture)
>>>>>> PCIe controller EP configuration.
>>>>> Please explain what makes the new architecture sufficiently different
>>>>> from the existing one such that a fallback compatible does not work.
>>>>>
>>>>> Same applies to the other binding patch.
>>>> Additionally, since this IP is likely in use on your sky1 SoC, why is a
>>>> soc-specific compatible for your integration not needed?
>>>>
>>> The sky1 SoC support patches will be developed and submitted by the Sky1
>>> team separately.
>> Why? Cixtech sent this patchset, they should send it with their user.
> 
> Hi Conor,
> 
> Please look at the communication history of this website.
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pci/patch/CH2PPF4D26F8E1C1CBD2A866C59AA55CD7AA2A12@CH2PPF4D26F8E1C.namprd07.prod.outlook.com/

And in that thread I asked for Soc specific compatible. More than once.
Conor asks again.

I don't understand your answers at all.

Best regards,
Krzysztof