linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH net-next v4 1/2] net: stmmac: Refactor VLAN implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <BN8PR03MB50738164E226BA57863F869BB4842@BN8PR03MB5073.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 07:12:28 +0000
From: "Ng, Boon Khai" <boon.khai.ng@...era.com>
To: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com"
	<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S . Miller"
	<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski
	<kuba@...nel.org>, Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, Alexandre
 Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
	<hawk@...nel.org>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Furong Xu
	<0x1207@...il.com>, "Gerlach, Matthew" <matthew.gerlach@...era.com>, "Ang,
 Tien Sung" <tien.sung.ang@...era.com>, "Tham, Mun Yew"
	<mun.yew.tham@...era.com>, "G Thomas, Rohan" <rohan.g.thomas@...era.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v4 1/2] net: stmmac: Refactor VLAN implementation

> > ... like the above on (which looks unnecessary?!?)
> 
> Also looks like a backward step, because we ask people to use the helper
> macros where possible.
> 

Hi Rusell,

These changes were not intended. It was my mistake to rely 
too much on Git to identify conflicts. I will cross-check the 
latest changes and update them in v5. I will cross-check the 
latest changes and submit them again in v5.

Regards,
Boon Khai