[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250425071157.GI18306@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 09:11:57 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Jürgen Groß <jgross@...e.com>
Cc: "Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, acme@...nel.org,
andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, namhyung@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, irogers@...gle.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
kan.liang@...ux.intel.com, wei.liu@...nel.org,
ajay.kaher@...adcom.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, vkuznets@...hat.com,
seanjc@...gle.com, luto@...nel.org, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, decui@...rosoft.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 21/34] x86/msr: Utilize the alternatives mechanism
to write MSR
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 11:57:01AM +0200, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 22.04.25 10:22, Xin Li (Intel) wrote:
> > This becomes even more silly for trivial instructions like STI/CLI
> > or in the worst case paravirt_nop().
>
> This is nonsense.
What Jurgen says. Someone hasn't done their homework.
static __always_inline void arch_local_irq_disable(void)
{
PVOP_ALT_VCALLEE0(irq.irq_disable, "cli;", ALT_NOT_XEN);
}
static __always_inline void arch_local_irq_enable(void)
{
PVOP_ALT_VCALLEE0(irq.irq_enable, "sti;", ALT_NOT_XEN);
}
That very much patches in STI/CLI directly when not Xen.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists