linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998-lenovo-miix-630: add Venus node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4b467493-5ea1-48d9-b4c0-56f05b7edb46@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 20:16:23 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@...il.com>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998-lenovo-miix-630: add Venus
 node

On 4/28/25 7:48 PM, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 10:21 AM Dmitry Baryshkov
> <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 09:40:52AM -0600, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 12:28 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
>>> <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Enable Venus on Lenovo Miix 630 and specify corresponding firmware file.
>>>
>>> I'm curious, how did this get validated?  I didn't think there was
>>> enough infrastructure enabled on this platform to check that the
>>> lights were even on on in Venus.
>>
>> I must admit, I basically checked that the firmware starts up. Marc
>> Gonzalez worked on enablement of Venus on MSM8998 (on the freebox), so I
>> didn't perform a thorough check.
> 
> If you got the FW starting up, that is farther than I expected.  I
> must be wrong about the capabilities then.
> The DT node looks right to me.

If PIL accepts it, it's basically good to go

Konrad