[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1ceedd5b-16c1-4844-815d-1623ab7e7ae8@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 09:08:56 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: "Christoph Lameter (Ampere)" <cl@...two.org>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>, Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] mm, slub: skip percpu sheaves for remote object
freeing
On 4/25/25 19:35, Christoph Lameter (Ampere) wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Apr 2025, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>
>> @@ -5924,8 +5948,15 @@ void slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab, void *object,
>> if (unlikely(!slab_free_hook(s, object, slab_want_init_on_free(s), false)))
>> return;
>>
>> - if (!s->cpu_sheaves || !free_to_pcs(s, object))
>> - do_slab_free(s, slab, object, object, 1, addr);
>> + if (s->cpu_sheaves) {
>> + if (likely(!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) ||
>> + slab_nid(slab) == numa_node_id())) {
>
> Ah. ok this removes remote object freeing to the pcs.
>
> numa_mem_id() is needed to support memory less numa nodes.
Ah right those... will fix, thanks.
>> + free_to_pcs(s, object);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + do_slab_free(s, slab, object, object, 1, addr);
>> }
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
>>
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists