[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2504280224110.31828@angie.orcam.me.uk>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 02:32:55 +0100 (BST)
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
cc: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] MIPS: Fix idle VS timer enqueue
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025, Huacai Chen wrote:
> > +r4k_wait_exit:
> > + .set mips0
> > + local_irq_disable
> > jr ra
> > - nop
> > - .set pop
> > - END(__r4k_wait)
> > + END(r4k_wait)
> > + .previous
> I'm very sorry for the late response, but I think ".previous" should
> be moved to the second patch.
Indeed; does it even assemble? Correctness aside I'd rather it didn't
cause someone a problem with bisecting sometime. NB I had no opportunity
either to look at this version earlier.
Maciej
Powered by blists - more mailing lists