lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250428120414.12101-1-dev.jain@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 17:34:07 +0530
From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: ryan.roberts@....com,
	david@...hat.com,
	willy@...radead.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	catalin.marinas@....com,
	will@...nel.org,
	Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
	lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
	vbabka@...e.cz,
	jannh@...gle.com,
	anshuman.khandual@....com,
	peterx@...hat.com,
	joey.gouly@....com,
	ioworker0@...il.com,
	baohua@...nel.org,
	kevin.brodsky@....com,
	quic_zhenhuah@...cinc.com,
	christophe.leroy@...roup.eu,
	yangyicong@...ilicon.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	namit@...are.com,
	hughd@...gle.com,
	yang@...amperecomputing.com,
	ziy@...dia.com,
	Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/7] Optimize mprotect for large folios

This patchset optimizes the mprotect() system call for large folios
by PTE-batching.

We use the following test cases to measure performance, mprotect()'ing
the mapped memory to read-only then read-write 40 times:

Test case 1: Mapping 1G of memory, touching it to get PMD-THPs, then
pte-mapping those THPs
Test case 2: Mapping 1G of memory with 64K mTHPs
Test case 3: Mapping 1G of memory with 4K pages

Average execution time on arm64, Apple M3:
Before the patchset:
T1: 7.9 seconds   T2: 7.9 seconds   T3: 4.2 seconds

After the patchset:
T1: 2.1 seconds   T2: 2.2 seconds   T3: 4.2 seconds

Observing T1/T2 and T3 before the patchset, we also remove the regression
introduced by ptep_get() on a contpte block. And, for large folios we get
an almost 276% performance improvement.

Dev Jain (7):
  mm: Refactor code in mprotect
  mm: Optimize mprotect() by batch-skipping PTEs
  mm: Add batched versions of ptep_modify_prot_start/commit
  arm64: Add batched version of ptep_modify_prot_start
  arm64: Add batched version of ptep_modify_prot_commit
  mm: Batch around can_change_pte_writable()
  mm: Optimize mprotect() through PTE-batching

 arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h |  10 ++
 arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c              |  21 +++-
 include/linux/mm.h               |   4 +-
 include/linux/pgtable.h          |  42 ++++++++
 mm/gup.c                         |   2 +-
 mm/huge_memory.c                 |   4 +-
 mm/memory.c                      |   6 +-
 mm/mprotect.c                    | 163 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
 mm/pgtable-generic.c             |  16 ++-
 9 files changed, 198 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)

-- 
2.30.2


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ