[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250429131116.GA25912@willie-the-truck>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 14:11:19 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Xiquan Zhang <zhangxiquan@...ilicon.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, corbet@....net,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, maz@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation (arm64):Advanced SIMD and floating point
support condition
On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 11:13:09AM +0800, Xiquan Zhang wrote:
> From: zhangyu <zhangyu550@...wei.com>
>
> Because the kernel code cannot be started from el1
> according to the booting.rst.
> It is found that CPTR_EL2.FPEN is not configured.
> After the configuration, the problem is solved.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhangyu <zhangyu550@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: zhangxiquan <zhangxiquan@...ilicon.com>
> ---
> Documentation/arch/arm64/booting.rst | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/arch/arm64/booting.rst b/Documentation/arch/arm64/booting.rst
> index dee7b6de864f..ccefc42b51bc 100644
> --- a/Documentation/arch/arm64/booting.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/arch/arm64/booting.rst
> @@ -309,6 +309,7 @@ Before jumping into the kernel, the following conditions must be met:
> - If EL2 is present and the kernel is entered at EL1:
>
> - CPTR_EL2.TFP (bit 10) must be initialised to 0b0.
> + - CPTR_EL2.FPEN (bit 21:20) must be initialised to 0b11.
Sorry, but I don't quite understand this. CPTR_EL2 has a different format
depending on HCR_EL2.E2H and the FPEN field only exists when that bit is
set to 1. In that case, however, why would the kernel be entered at EL1?
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists