[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aBEV5gxYoDFct9PC@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:09:42 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@...dia.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
"joey.gouly@....com" <joey.gouly@....com>,
"suzuki.poulose@....com" <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
"yuzenghui@...wei.com" <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"ryan.roberts@....com" <ryan.roberts@....com>,
"shahuang@...hat.com" <shahuang@...hat.com>,
"lpieralisi@...nel.org" <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
"david@...hat.com" <david@...hat.com>,
Aniket Agashe <aniketa@...dia.com>, Neo Jia <cjia@...dia.com>,
Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@...dia.com>,
"Tarun Gupta (SW-GPU)" <targupta@...dia.com>,
Vikram Sethi <vsethi@...dia.com>, Andy Currid <acurrid@...dia.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>, Dan Williams <danw@...dia.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhiw@...dia.com>, Matt Ochs <mochs@...dia.com>,
Uday Dhoke <udhoke@...dia.com>, Dheeraj Nigam <dnigam@...dia.com>,
Krishnakant Jaju <kjaju@...dia.com>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"sebastianene@...gle.com" <sebastianene@...gle.com>,
"coltonlewis@...gle.com" <coltonlewis@...gle.com>,
"kevin.tian@...el.com" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
"yi.l.liu@...el.com" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"ardb@...nel.org" <ardb@...nel.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"gshan@...hat.com" <gshan@...hat.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"ddutile@...hat.com" <ddutile@...hat.com>,
"tabba@...gle.com" <tabba@...gle.com>,
"qperret@...gle.com" <qperret@...gle.com>,
"kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev" <kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] KVM: arm64: Allow cacheable stage 2 mapping using
VMA flags
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 01:44:30PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 05:03:18PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 11:14:37AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 02:27:02PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > > BTW, we should reject exec mappings as well (they probably fail for S1
> > > > VFIO since set_pte_at() will try to do cache maintenance).
> > >
> > > To be clear the S2 should leave the mapping as execute allowed
> > > though. Only the VM knows how it will use this memory and VM's do
> > > actually execute out of the cachable PFNMAP VMA today. The VM will set
> > > any execute deny/allow on its S1 table according to how it uses the
> > > memory.
> >
> > If S2 is executable, wouldn't KVM try to invalidate the I-cache and it
> > won't have an alias to do this? Unless it doesn't end up in
> > stage2_map_walker_try_leaf() or the walk has been flagged as skipping
> > the CMO.
>
> Okay, that does seem to have been overlooked a bit. The answer I got
> back is:
>
> Cachable PFNMAP is also relying on ARM64_HAS_CACHE_DIC also, simlar to
> how S2FWB allows KVM to avoid flushing the D cache, that CPU cap
> allows KVM to avoid flushing the icache and turns icache_inval_pou()
> into a NOP.
Another CAP for executable PFNMAP then? I feel like this is a different
use-case (e.g. more like general purpose CXL attached memory) than the
GPU one. Unless FWB implies CTR_EL0.DIC (AFAIK, it doesn't) we may be
restricting some CPUs.
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists