[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wiAPQFf-RUr=8ra1sYdfGPGLb4QbV8THE9zY3n820L94g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 13:12:48 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@...pl>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bitops/32: Convert variable_ffs() and fls() zero-case
handling to C
On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 at 12:13, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com> wrote:
>
> That would improve code generation for 32bit, but generally regress 64bit.
>
> Preloading the destination register with -1 is better than the CMOV form
> emitted by the builtin; BSF's habit of conditionally not writing the
> destination register *is* a CMOV of sorts.
Right you are. So we'd need to do this just for the x86-32 case. Oh
well. Ugly, but still prettier than what we have now, I guess.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists