linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] ipe: add script enforcement with BPRM check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1745961770-7188-2-git-send-email-jasjivsingh@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 14:22:50 -0700
From: Jasjiv Singh <jasjivsingh@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: wufan@...nel.org,
	paul@...l-moore.com,
	jmorris@...ei.org,
	serge@...lyn.com,
	mic@...ikod.net
Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	jasjivsingh_microsoft <jasjivsingh@...ux.microsoft.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] ipe: add script enforcement with BPRM check

From: jasjivsingh_microsoft <jasjivsingh@...ux.microsoft.com>

Like direct file execution (e.g. ./script.sh), indirect file execution
(e.g. sh script.sh) needs to be enforce by IPE based on the rules.  
Added a new security_bprm_creds_for_exec() hook to verify the indirect 
file's integrity.

Signed-off-by: Jasjiv Singh <jasjivsingh@...ux.microsoft.com>
---
 security/ipe/hooks.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 security/ipe/hooks.h |  2 ++
 security/ipe/ipe.c   |  1 +
 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+)

diff --git a/security/ipe/hooks.c b/security/ipe/hooks.c
index d0323b81cd8f..12713a0495cf 100644
--- a/security/ipe/hooks.c
+++ b/security/ipe/hooks.c
@@ -35,6 +35,29 @@ int ipe_bprm_check_security(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 	return ipe_evaluate_event(&ctx);
 }
 
+/**
+ * ipe_bprm_creds_for_exec() - ipe security hook function for bprm creds check.
+ * @bprm: Supplies a pointer to a linux_binprm structure to source the file
+ *	  being evaluated.
+ *
+ * This LSM hook is called when a script is checked for execution through the
+ * execveat syscall with the AT_EXECVE_CHECK flag.
+ *
+ * Return:
+ * * %0		- Success
+ * * %-EACCES	- Did not pass IPE policy
+ */
+int ipe_bprm_creds_for_exec(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
+{
+	struct ipe_eval_ctx ctx = IPE_EVAL_CTX_INIT;
+
+	if (!bprm->is_check)
+		return 0;
+
+	ipe_build_eval_ctx(&ctx, bprm->file, IPE_OP_EXEC, IPE_HOOK_BPRM_CHECK);
+	return ipe_evaluate_event(&ctx);
+}
+
 /**
  * ipe_mmap_file() - ipe security hook function for mmap check.
  * @f: File being mmap'd. Can be NULL in the case of anonymous memory.
diff --git a/security/ipe/hooks.h b/security/ipe/hooks.h
index 38d4a387d039..1c16a25d806e 100644
--- a/security/ipe/hooks.h
+++ b/security/ipe/hooks.h
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ enum ipe_hook_type {
 
 int ipe_bprm_check_security(struct linux_binprm *bprm);
 
+int ipe_bprm_creds_for_exec(struct linux_binprm *bprm);
+
 int ipe_mmap_file(struct file *f, unsigned long reqprot, unsigned long prot,
 		  unsigned long flags);
 
diff --git a/security/ipe/ipe.c b/security/ipe/ipe.c
index 4317134cb0da..845e3fd7a345 100644
--- a/security/ipe/ipe.c
+++ b/security/ipe/ipe.c
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ struct ipe_inode *ipe_inode(const struct inode *inode)
 
 static struct security_hook_list ipe_hooks[] __ro_after_init = {
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(bprm_check_security, ipe_bprm_check_security),
+	LSM_HOOK_INIT(bprm_creds_for_exec, ipe_bprm_creds_for_exec),
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(mmap_file, ipe_mmap_file),
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(file_mprotect, ipe_file_mprotect),
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(kernel_read_file, ipe_kernel_read_file),
-- 
2.34.1