linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 10/16] x86/bugs: Restructure retbleed mitigation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250429082143.GCaBCMF6MCxxwZsfs-@fat_crate.local>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 10:21:43 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Kaplan, David" <David.Kaplan@....com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
	Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/16] x86/bugs: Restructure retbleed mitigation

On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 08:55:13PM +0000, Kaplan, David wrote:
> It's really just following the same order as the order that the select
> functions are called, which largely matches the order in existing code.

Oh ok, as long as there's not any undocumented magic in there...

> While this is mostly true, there's still a few dependencies with the update
> functions which are clearly noted with comments.

Ack.

> Yeah this makes sense.

Ok, merged in.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette