[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d542d18f-1caa-6fea-e2c3-3555c87bcf64@google.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 02:40:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>
cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Meta kernel team <kernel-team@...a.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: multi-memcg percpu charge cache
[PATCH mm-unstable] memcg: multi-memcg percpu charge cache - fix 3
Fix 2 has been giving me lots of memcg OOM kills not seen before:
it's better to stock nr_pages than the uninitialized stock_pages.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 178d79e68107..02c6f553dc53 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1952,7 +1952,7 @@ static void refill_stock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
}
css_get(&memcg->css);
WRITE_ONCE(stock->cached[i], memcg);
- WRITE_ONCE(stock->nr_pages[i], stock_pages);
+ WRITE_ONCE(stock->nr_pages[i], nr_pages);
}
local_unlock_irqrestore(&memcg_stock.stock_lock, flags);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists