lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <95e42755-13ad-4659-903f-5f087926c0a1@csgroup.eu>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 19:35:42 +0200
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
 Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
 Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
 Naveen N Rao <naveen@...nel.org>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
 Anatolij Gustschin <agust@...x.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
 Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] powerpc: 52xx/gpio: use new line value setter
 callbacks



Le 08/04/2025 à 09:21, Bartosz Golaszewski a écrit :
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> 
> struct gpio_chip now has callbacks for setting line values that return
> an integer, allowing to indicate failures. Convert the driver to using
> them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>

Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>

> ---
>   arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_gpt.c | 6 ++++--
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_gpt.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_gpt.c
> index 1ea591ec6083..c96af6b0eab4 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_gpt.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_gpt.c
> @@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static int mpc52xx_gpt_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio)
>   	return (in_be32(&gpt->regs->status) >> 8) & 1;
>   }
>   
> -static void
> +static int
>   mpc52xx_gpt_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int v)
>   {
>   	struct mpc52xx_gpt_priv *gpt = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> @@ -293,6 +293,8 @@ mpc52xx_gpt_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int v)
>   	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&gpt->lock, flags);
>   	clrsetbits_be32(&gpt->regs->mode, MPC52xx_GPT_MODE_GPIO_MASK, r);
>   	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpt->lock, flags);
> +
> +	return 0;
>   }
>   
>   static int mpc52xx_gpt_gpio_dir_in(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio)
> @@ -334,7 +336,7 @@ static void mpc52xx_gpt_gpio_setup(struct mpc52xx_gpt_priv *gpt)
>   	gpt->gc.direction_input  = mpc52xx_gpt_gpio_dir_in;
>   	gpt->gc.direction_output = mpc52xx_gpt_gpio_dir_out;
>   	gpt->gc.get = mpc52xx_gpt_gpio_get;
> -	gpt->gc.set = mpc52xx_gpt_gpio_set;
> +	gpt->gc.set_rv = mpc52xx_gpt_gpio_set;
>   	gpt->gc.base = -1;
>   	gpt->gc.parent = gpt->dev;
>   
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ