linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] objtool: Detect and warn about indirect calls in _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250430190600.GQ4439@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 21:06:00 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com,
	wei.liu@...nel.org, decui@...rosoft.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
	seanjc@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, ardb@...nel.org,
	kees@...nel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jpoimboe@...nel.org,
	linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
	samitolvanen@...gle.com, ojeda@...nel.org, xin@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] objtool: Detect and warn about indirect calls
 in __nocfi functions

On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 07:24:15AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> >KVM has another; the VMX interrupt injection stuff calls the IDT handler
> >directly.  Is there an alternative? Can we keep a table of Linux functions
> >slighly higher up the call stack (asm_\cfunc ?) and add CFI to those?

> We do have a table of handlers higher up in the stack in the form of
> the dispatch tables for FRED. They don't in general even need the
> assembly entry stubs, either.

Oh, right. I'll go have a look at those.