[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aBHvwUAISo2JhYSz@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 12:39:13 +0300
From: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>,
Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@...cinc.com>,
Xilin Wu <wuxilin123@...il.com>,
Jens Glathe <jens.glathe@...schoolsolutions.biz>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srini@...nel.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <quic_kdybcio@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100-*: Drop useless DP3
compatible override
On 25-04-30 01:26:13, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 10:42:28AM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > It all started with the support for CRD back when we had different
> > compatibles for eDP and DP. Meanwhile, that has been sorted out and it
> > is now figured out at runtime while using only the DP compatible.
> >
> > It's almost funny how this got copied over from CRD and spread to all
> > X Elite platforms.
> >
> > TBH, the best reason to drop it ASAP is to make sure this doesn't spread
> > beyond X Elite to newer platforms.
> >
> > Functionally nothing changes.
>
> Looking at the diff I wonder if this part should also be simplified:
>
> /delete-property/ #sound-dai-cells;
>
> This is done by all upstream X1E boards, so maybe just drop the
> #sound-dai-cells directly in x1e80100.dtsi?
Yeah, I'm not sure about that.
Though the DP3 PHY is currently used as eDP, I think it could be used
as DP. So I think it makes more sense to keep the DP3 controller as is
in the SoC dtsi and delete the #sound-dai-cells property in each board
specific dts. Don't know if it will ever be the case with this SoC, but
maybe someone will use DP3 with the PHY configured as DP rather than
eDP.
Not sure if I'm 100% right about this though.
Dmitry, Bjorn, do you think that is accurate enough?
>
> Greetings,
>
> -- Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists